Legal Opinion
Furbreeders Agricultural Cooperative v. Wiesley
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1942No. 6469PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
The Utah State Industrial Union Council, following the procedure prescribed by the Utah Labor Relations Act, chap. 55, Laws of Utah, 1937, charged before the Utah Labor Relations Board that the Fur Breeders Agricultural Cooperative was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting intrastate commerce and the orderly operation of industry within the State of Utah. The Board issued a complaint against the Cooperative based on the Union’s charges and set a day for hearing.
The Cooperative, contending that the complaint affirmatively showed on its face that the Board had no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Warner Barnes & Co. v. Kokosai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Mayers v. Bronson, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Green v. Grimes-Stassforth Stationary Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Utah State Retirement OfficeUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Olson v. District Court, Second Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Davis CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Utah State Road Commission v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Helm v. Utah State Highway Patrol Civil Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.