Legal Opinion

Myers v. Flewellen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1932No. 4160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the case as above).

The contention that .the suit being, as shown by appellees’ petition, for sums aggregating more than $1,000, the court below was without power to hear and determine it, must be sustained. When jurisdiction depends, as here, upon the “amount in controversy,” such amount is the aggregate of the sums claimed in the petition. Isbell v. Dredging Co., 113 Tex. 528, 261 S. W. 762; Security Co. v. Bank, 93 Tex. 575, 57 S. W. 22; Rust v. Ry. Co., 107 Tex. 385, 180 S. W. 95. The aggregate of the sum claimed in ap-pellees’ petition was $2,300. The county…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Security Co. v. Panhandle National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. G. W. Rust v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API