Legal Opinion
Young v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2009No. 07-6271PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Adam Fletcher Young, an Oklahoma state prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the dismissal of his claim for false arrest/false imprisonment brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The district court determined that Mr. Young’s claim was time-barred. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM the dismissal of his claim.
I.Background
On July 9, 2007, Mr. Young filed his complaint, alleging that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated by federal agents Joel Davis and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Tony Fisher v. Jordan HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Requena v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Fox v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Boyd v. WerholtzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.