Legal Opinion

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Tabas

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 1927No. 3498PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

Abraham Tabas, Morris Tabas, and Samuel Tabas, copartners trading as the Northern Metals Company, entered into a contract with the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, defendant, to purchase from it “all underground cable used for the supply of light and power from main substation to the wet basins and to the various ways’ substations, approximately 125 net tons,” located at Hog Island, Pa. The material was purchased “as is, where is,” for “$75.60 per net ton.”

When the contract was signed, the plaintiffs paid to defendant $945 in cash, and delivered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Wells v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Docks Commission v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1997
  3. Pleatmaster, Inc., and Bert P. Solomon v. Consolidated Trimming CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  4. Execution of State Bids, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API