Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Scalise

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1993No. 91-1532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, Judge.

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) seeks review of an order entered by a judge of compensation claims, which order held that a policy of workers’ compensation insurance issued by Liberty Mutual to Joseph J. Scalise, as employer, extended coverage to Scalise, os an employee, for injuries sustained while pursuing his occupation as a carpet installer. We conclude that the policy did not cover Scalise as an employee and, therefore, reverse.

For a number of years prior to 1989, Scalise had been a carpet installer, principally as an independent contractor. In June 1989,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. YatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. AMI Ins. Agency v. ElieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Boyd-Scarp Enterprises, Inc. v. SaundersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Key v. GoleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Vallina v. VICTOR FUEGO CONST. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H & H DESIGN BUILDERS v. Travelers Indem.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Security Mgt. v. Hartford Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Campbell v. HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API