Legal Opinion
Inre: Searcy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 20, 2014No. 2014-140UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Andrew Searcy seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) to reopen and adjudicate his previously dismissed claims. The Department of Agriculture opposes. Mr. Searcy replies and submits a motion for judgment, which repeats the arguments made in the petition.
Mr. Searcy had previously raised claims under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, the Veterans’ Reemployment Rights Act of 1940, and the Veterans Employment Opportunity Act of 1998. Those claims were addressed by this court in two previous appeals. See Searcy v.…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Searcy v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
4Cited by2 opinions
- Searcy v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Searcy v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020