Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Jackson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1923No. 7877PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom 'Williamson County. Original Habeas Corpus proceeding, asking release from jail under an order of the District Court punishing witness for contempt for not answering questions before the grand jury, which has since adjourned. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Relator was adjudged guilty of contempt by the Criminal District Court of Williamson county on May 9, 1923, for refusal to answer questions propounded to him by the grand jury of said county. He was fined $100 and committed to jail until such fine should be paid and until he should fully and truthfully answer said questions. Again on May 12th he was brought before the court and adjudged guilty of contempt for his refusal to answer certain other questions before said grand jury and again fined $100 and committed to jail until he should fully and truthfully answer said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ex Parte MuncyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Ex Parte TinsleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Ex Parte CopelandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EdoneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Ex Parte MoorehouseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Ex Parte PortCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Ex Parte ShorthouseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Ex Parte MyrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API