Ex Parte Edone
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*447OPINION
W.C. DAVIS, Judge.
The Court originally granted leave to file this original application for writ of habeas corpus in order to determine whether applicants were being illegally restrained of their liberty on account of their respective refusals to answer certain questions propounded before a grand jury. See Art. 20.15, V.A.C.C.P. Specifically, the court granted leave to file to consider the application of Ex parte Port, 674 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Cr.App.1984) to the instant case.
On March 3,1986, applicants were served with a “Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Te-cum,” issued by the district attorney of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ex Parte WilkinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ex Parte PortCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Bourque v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Stern v. State Ex Rel. AnselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Dallas County District Attorney v. Doe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Jermaine Earvin Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.