Pardue v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
In a single-judge decision dated February 8, 1999, the Court affirmed a June 27, 1997, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board), which determined that no clear and unmistakable error (CUE) had occurred in August 1972 and November 1974 VA regional office (RO) decisions. The appellant had asserted CUE in the 1972 and 1974 RO decisions as the basis for her claim for enhanced dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1311(a)(2). Although the Court affirmed the Board’s CUE determinations, the Court further determined that the appellant was entitled…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Drosky v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Strouth v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Christine Hix, Claimant-Appellee, and Mary L. Pardue, Claimant-Appellee v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Hix v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
4Cited by3 opinions
- Hensley v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Luyster v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Hensley v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002