Legal Opinion

Hayes v. State Exchange Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1915No. 5602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County;. Edward ifewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by the State Exchange Bank against W. N. Hayes and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WATTS, C.

The State Exchange Bank sued R. O. Brewer and W. N. Hayes to recover on a promissory note in the superior court of Oklahoma county, where the case was tried to the court. Plaintiff introduced the note in evidence and rested, and at conclusion of defendants’ evidence the court sustained a demurrer thereto and gave judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Hayes brings error.

The record discloses that on July 19, 1912, defendant Brewer and John R. Rose, as principals, and Hayes, as an accommodation indorser, were indebted to plaintiff, evidenced by promissory note of prior date; that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Mitchell v. Altus State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Benton County Savings Bank v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Wm. J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. SecorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. J. S. Mayfield Lumber Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API