Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Burnett

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 2015No. A14-1770PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of his perjury conviction, arguing that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his false statements were material. We affirm.

FACTS

In September 2010, respondent State of Minnesota charged appellant Gary Lee Burnett with four counts of criminal sexual conduct, alleging that Burnett had engaged in sexual penetration and/or sexual contact with a six-year-old victim. The charges were tried to a jury in February 2012. The state relied on the victim’s accounts of abuse, apparently presenting no corroborating physical evidence or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API