Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1931No. 6 Div. 23PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

These two defendants and another, who was unrecognized and unidentified, were seen at a whisky still which-was being set up preparatory to the manufacture of whisky. The still was located in a wood near a branch and about one-half mile from where defendants lived. These two defendants were identified by one eyewitness as two of the parties at the still, and this testimony was corroborated by circumstances tending to connect the defendants. The acts of the defendants in and about the still testified to by the state’s witnesses, coupled with a precipitate flight on discovery, were sufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parmer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Slaton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API