Goodreau v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and claim dismissed. Memorandum: We conclude that, on the facts of this case, claimant has not proven his claim. To establish a cause of action based on lack of informed consent, the patient must prove: (1) that the physician did not fully inform him of the various alternatives and their risks; and (2) that a reasonably prudent person, fully informed, would not have consented to the treatment (Dries v Gregor, 72 AD2d 231, 236; Fogal v Genesee Hosp., 41 AD2d 468, 473). Plaintiff was diagnosed as having lymphocytic lymphosarcoma of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fogal v. Genesee HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Dries v. GregorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Larkin v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marchione v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Innucci v. BauersachsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Shinn v. St. James Mercy HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1987
- Tibodeau v. KeeleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994