Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Budd G. Goodman, J.

The defendant has moved, on the eve of trial, to dismiss count one of the indictment, charging him with grand larceny in the third degree.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.

The defendant contends that count one of the indictment (grand larceny in the third degree) must be dismissed because what was allegedly stolen by the defendant (food consumed by the defendant and his invited guests at a restaurant which was not paid for) constituted a theft of services, rather than a *678theft of property, which is not properly prosecutable under the larceny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. NeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. People v. TanseyNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. McDonaldCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
  5. People v. TopinoNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API