Legal Opinion
Arnaud's Restaurant, Inc. v. Cotter
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1954No. 14658PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The amended complaint alleged in substance that the plaintiff went to Arnaud’s Restaurant in New Orleans, Louisiana, and was there served an order of pompano en papilotte which, by reason of the negligence of the latter, contained a large, solid piece of crab shell which was •a substance foreign to that dish; also that Arnaud’s represented to the public that the food served was fit and proper for human consumption; that the plaintiff swallowed the piece of crab shell with results, detailed in the complaint, which caused him damages and injuries and expense. The answer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Le Blanc v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Silva v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Goodwin v. Country ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Victoria St. Pierre Lartigue v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Liggett and Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.