Legal Opinion

Lassetter v. King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 31, 1947No. 6 Div. 613PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The Court of Appeals has rested its affirmance of the judgment in this cause upon action of the court in giving charge number 15, which is set out in the opinion of that court. That is the only question determined, by the Court of Appeals and the only question here presented for our consideration.

Counsel for appellant insists the charge was merely misleading and that the action of the court in giving the charge did not justify a reversal, and hence would not justify the trial court in granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It is to be observed that this charge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Partridge v. ForsythSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Mobile Light R. Co. v. NicholasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Kenan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Whitt v. HulseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Nettles v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Humphrey v. BoschungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. McGough Bakeries Corporation v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Taylor v. Brownell-O'Hear Pontiac CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API