Legal Opinion

Thornton v. City of Pittsburgh

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GARY L. LANCASTER, Chief Judge.

This is an action in civil rights. Plaintiffs, Theresa Thornton and Jeremiah Mitchell, as co-administrators of the estate of Curtis Mitchell, assert a claim pursuant to section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (“section 1983”), 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated Curtis Mitchell’s right to substantive due process granted by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to come to his rescue and take him to the hospital via ambulance during a snow storm that dropped more than 21 inches of snow in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CRESPO v. WELLS FARGO BANK AND COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. MCKINNEY v. PIAZZADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  3. Reiner v. Northumberland CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API