Legal Opinion

Continental Can Co. v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1959No. 34933Published

1Opinion of the Court

56 Wn.2d 456 (1959)

347 P.2d 887

354 P.2d 25

CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC., Respondent,

v.

COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF KING COUNTY et al., Appellants.[1]

No. 34933.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 24, 1959.

Taylor & Taylor, Charles O. Carroll, and K.G. Smiles, for appellants.

Summers, Bucey & Howard, Lane Summers, and Richard W. Buchanan, for respondent.

HUNTER, J.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff corporation against the defendant Commercial Waterway District No. 1 and its commissioners, to compel the defendants to issue a deed and title insurance to the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Moore v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Whitfield v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. Continental Can Co. v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. McPherson Bros. v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API