Legal Opinion
Rothenberg v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided December 8, 2004No. 01-03-00364-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIM TAFT, Justice.
After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, appellant, Eric Lee Rothenberg, pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to the offense of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine weighing more than four grams and less than 200 grams. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.102(6), 481.112(a), (d) (Vernon 2003). As part of the agreement, appellant also pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs alleging the prior offenses of delivery of, and possession of, controlled substances. The trial court found appellant guilty, assessed his punishment at 30…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moskey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Hankston, Gareic JerardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- State v. Molder, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Eric Joseph Henstenberg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
- Eric Joseph Henstenberg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.