Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2006No. ED 88620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKER T. SHAW, Chief Judge.

Otis Smith (Defendant) appeals from an order denying his motion for a hearing de novo for the presiding judge en banc to adjudicate the sufficiency of the indictment and a due process violation. Because such an order is not a final, appealable judgment, the appeal is dismissed.

Defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced for two counts of capital murder on August 12, 1983. Some twenty-three years later, on March 16, 2006, Defendant filed a motion for a hearing de novo for the presiding judge en banc to adjudicate the sufficiency of the indictment and the due process…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. STATE OF MISSOURI v. MONTIA McCAULEYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. PayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LEANN BANDERMANMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. STATE OF MISSOURI v. TAMARA D. TIDWELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API