Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LEANN BANDERMAN

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2019No. SD35501PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD35501 ) Filed: April 1, 2019 LEANN BANDERMAN, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DENT COUNTY Honorable Brandi L. Baird, Associate Circuit Judge REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS Leann Banderman (Banderman) had two separate jail board bills taxed as court costs in her criminal case. She appeals from the denial of her motion to retax costs. Because there is no statutory authority to treat jail board bills as court costs, the trial court’s ruling is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Greeley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. State v. StoutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Missouri v. Thomas J. SavageMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API