Legal Opinion

Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. v. Kapoor

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 29, 1996No. 92 C 5508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Fujisawa filed suit in 1992 alleging that Kapoor violated Rule 10b-5. In November of 1992, Kapoor filed a motion to dismiss Fujisawa’s 10b-5 claim, arguing that Fujisawa could not allege a claim for control person liability without alleging a primary violation by Lyphomed. Fujisawa contended in its response brief that “[njowhere in the complaint do plaintiffs claim that Kapoor is liable for Lyphomed’s conduct solely by virtue of his being a controlling person.” Fujisawa’s 10b-5 claim survived the motion to dismiss and discovery began. During…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, Inc. v. PreletzDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  4. McCann v. Frank B. Hall & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API