Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Cumberledge

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 20, 1979No. 29,767; ACM 21673PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

This and three companion cases1 were previously before this Court; the resultant corrective action was due to the disqualification of the reviewing authority because of immunity or clemency given by a subordinate commander to certain prosecution witnesses. We have now2 granted a hearing *204in this case to determine if the legal representative of the accused was denied fair access to the prosecution’s sole witness and whether the accused was subjected to and prejudiced by improper cross-examination. Both of these questions are answered in the negative,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. WillisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. EnloeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. Chavez-ReyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. KillebrewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. MartinezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API