Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 2005PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Charles Jackson, an inmate at SCI-Gra-terford, petitions for review of a decision of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that denied his petition for administrative review of the Board’s decision to recommit Jackson as a technical parole violator for having committed “assaultive behavior.” Jackson asserts that the Board did not have subject matter jurisdiction over his case because at the time of the alleged behavior he was still in the custody of SCI-Graterford and thus was not yet on parole and that his behavior during the incident that led to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Sigafoos v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Moore v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Dunkleberger v. BD. OF PROB. & PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Zion v. NassanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Flowers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Ickes v. GrassmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Malarik v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API