Strathmere v. Karavas
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARDY, District Judge.
The defendants Karavas filed a motion for new trial pursuant to Rule 59, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, urging that the jury’s award of $209,000 as compensatory damages and $200,000 as punitive damages was excessive and contrary to the evidence. *479The Court ordered that unless plaintiffs accepted a remittitur of the compensatory damages to $155,000 and of the punitive damages to $10,000, the motion for new trial would be granted. The plaintiffs accepted the reduction of the compensatory damages but rejected the reduction of the punitive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Irvine v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Benjamin v. RandellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Harris v. Howard P. Foley Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- First National Bank of Glencoe v. LincolnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888