Harris v. Howard P. Foley Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
The question before us is whether or not an appeal may be taken from a remittitur order. We deem the problem to be of such general .interest that instead of ruling by a minute entry order, a formal opinion should be written.
The facts in relation to the problem may be stated as follows: The appellant herein was the plaintiff below. Upon the conclusion of the trial in a personal injury action, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $44,000 and a formal written judgment in this sum was duly signed and filed. A timely motion for new trial was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kemble v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Lyric Amusement Co. v. JeffriesArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Borrow v. El Dorado Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Overson v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Overson v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Arizona Land Corp. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Strathmere v. KaravasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1984