Legal Opinion

Harris v. Howard P. Foley Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 31, 1965No. 1 CA-CIV 270PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The question before us is whether or not an appeal may be taken from a remittitur order. We deem the problem to be of such general .interest that instead of ruling by a minute entry order, a formal opinion should be written.

The facts in relation to the problem may be stated as follows: The appellant herein was the plaintiff below. Upon the conclusion of the trial in a personal injury action, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $44,000 and a formal written judgment in this sum was duly signed and filed. A timely motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kemble v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lyric Amusement Co. v. JeffriesArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Borrow v. El Dorado Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Overson v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Overson v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Arizona Land Corp. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Strathmere v. KaravasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API