Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. Little

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 23, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Pulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Winn —

Reversing.

In 1909 the city of Pulton, a fourth class city, after duly adopting an ordinance, let to Charles W. Little, the appellee, the original construction, at the cost of the adjacent property holders, of certain of its streets. The streets were to be built of macadam. There were three separate contracts, known respectively as the West Pulton, East Pulton and Lake street contracts. In November of that year the city council met and upon report of the city engineer accepted the West Pulton work as completed under Little’s contract. Within the thirty days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montgomery County v. Menefee County CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Creekmore v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. City of Maysville v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. City of Earlington v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. City of Covington v. McKennaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. City of Raceland v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API