City of Earlington v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Willis—
Affirming,
Earlington, a city of the fourth class, enacted appropriate legislation for the improvement of its streets. The contract for the construction of concrete curbs and gutters was awarded to the Hopkins County Construction Company. It constructed concrete curbs and gutters upon all the streets covered by the contract except an immaterial portion, where it was prevented from doing any work by the delay of the city in building a retaining wall. The city engineer made an estimate of the total cost of the improvement, complying substantial!;/ with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Floyd County v. Owego Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Foeller v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Creekmore v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Worrell Manufacturing Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Black v. Elkhorn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Brown v. Woods Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Jennings v. Fidelity Columbia Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Patterson v. MiracleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- City of Covington v. McKennaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.