Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1923No. 6 Div. 777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The insistence is that under counts 3 and 4 of the complaint a tort committed in Alabama is charged.

The former appeal is reported in 206 Ala. 129, 89 South. 299, 17 A. L. R. 103. If the suit message, for all purposes, was impressed with interstate character, the plaintiff can no more recover damages for mental anguish because of the alleged breach of duty to notify the sender of nondelivery, than for the breach of the initial duty to transmit and deliver (Western Union Tel. Co. v. Beasley, 205 Ala. 115, 87 South. 858; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Speight, 254 U. S. 17, 41 Sup. Ct. 11, 65 L. Ed.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeightSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BarbourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGuff v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bashinsky, Case & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Western Union Tel. Co. v. TatumAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Davenport v. Western Union Tel. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API