Kuriakuz v. West Bloomfield Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant West Bloomfield Township appeals by leave granted from an April 2, 1990, order of the Oakland Circuit Court denying summary disposition. The township brought its motion under MCR 2.116(C)(7), (8), and (10), claiming, among other things, governmental immunity. We reverse.
Plaintiffs’ property abuts the land of defendant Foxpointe Condominium Association. Plaintiffs claim that rain water drains from Foxpointe’s property to plaintiffs’ property, causing substantial damage. Defendant township reviewed and approved Foxpointe’s site plan. The township neither required nor issued permits…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Ward v. Frank’s Nursery & Crafts, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- McSwain v. Redford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ahearn v. Bloomfield Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Citizens Insurance v. Bloomfield TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Continental Paper & Supply Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fingerle v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Continental Paper & Supply Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.