Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Conley

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1927No. Docket No. 4605PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

All of the objections raised to the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein are predicated upon the proposition that the indebtedness of the defendant to plaintiff was an indebtedness as set forth in the amended complaint, to wit, moneys embezzled by the defendant which had been entrusted to the defendant for the purpose of purchasing second mortgages. The defendant, according to the evidence and the amended pleadings, appropriated to his own use a sum aggregating about $5,000, and thereafter gave a note for part thereof and the balance in cash. Upon paying up the most of the original…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Capron v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Roche v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  2. Mirich v. Underwriter's at Lloyd's LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Mathewson v. NaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. United States Credit Bureau, Inc. v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Caballero v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API