Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 27, 1975No. Civ. H-74-398PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

This is a pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1970) by the plaintiff, , a white student at Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut, who alleges that he was subjected to racial discrimination by the defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Co., as a result of its refusal to consider him for a position in the- Sears Summer Internship Program for Minority Students. The defendant has moved to dismiss the action on three distinct grounds.

The complaint alleges that on December 7, 1973 the defendant conducted reeruiting…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Anderson v. ConboyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Cubas v. Rapid Am. Corp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Shore v. HowardDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API