Legal Opinion · Dissent

TBF Financial, L.L.C. v. Stone

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2007No. 27357Published

1DissentJohn E. Parrish, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the principal opinion’s suggestion that the confused state of the record could hardly be overstated. However, it was the obligation of the plaintiff to make a record before the trial court that enabled that court to discern and decide the issues before it and that permits meaningful appellate review. State v. Fortner, 84 S.W.3d 507, 513 (Mo.App.2002). Plaintiff did not do so.

The principal opinion correctly states that a party who does not respond to requests for admission admits those matters; that a court must consider such admissions in deciding the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bydalek v. BrinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Springfield Land & Development Co. v. BassMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. M.F.M. v. J.O.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. P & K Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Tusten Townhomes Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. St. Louis County v. McCluneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API