Legal Opinion

Williams v. Cammack

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1854PublishedCited by 46 opinions

In error from the superior court of chancery; Hon. Charles ‘Scott, chancellor. This was a bill filed by D. O. Williams to enjoin the collection of certain taxes, and complainant states that it was the 'duty of the board of police of Issaquena county, to appoint ■levee commissioners immediately, who were to be freeholders and residents of the county.

Read the full summary

In error from the superior court of chancery; Hon. Charles ‘Scott, chancellor. This was a bill filed by D. O. Williams to enjoin the collection of certain taxes, and complainant states that it was the 'duty of the board of police of Issaquena county, to appoint ■levee commissioners immediately, who were to be freeholders and residents of the county. These inspectors were to make and report estimates to the board of police, which was to assess the tax “ not exceeding ten'cents per acre on all lands lying on or within ten .miles ” of the river; and five cents per acre on all lands “ lying ten…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Handy

The appellant filed this bill in the superior court of chancery, to enjoin the collection of a tax of five cents per acre, assessed upon his lands lying in Issaquena county, by the board of police of that county, by virtue of an act passed by the legislature, and approved on the 20th February, 1850, “ to provide for the erection, repair, and preservation of levees on the Mississippi River, in the county of Issaquena.”

The bill charges in substance, that the proceedings of the board of police were not in accordance with the act authorizing the levy of the tax, in many respects. First, it was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. City of Bridgeport v. Housatonuc RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  4. Lansing v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  5. Thomas v. LelandNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Ah Lim v. Territory of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Stewart v. Bd. of Super. of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API