Legal Opinion

Meyers Excursion & Navigation Co. v. The Emma Kate Ross

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel for damages by collision.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This is an action for collision which occurred on the night of June 28, 1888, on the Hudson river, a short distance south of the ferry of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, between the steam-tug Emma Kate Ross and the steam-boat Chrystal Stream. From the evidence in the cause, it appears that about 10 o’clock on the evening of the 23d of June, 1888, the Chrystal Stream was proceeding down the river, on a southerly course, parallel with the New Jersey shore, and about 300 yards distant easterly from the exterior line of piers. She was making for the docks of the Gommunipaw Coal Company to tie…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. The CayugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. The Morning LightSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. The EleanoraU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
  5. The" Annie Lindsley"Supreme Court of the United States · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The George W. RobyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  2. Brigham v. LuckenbachDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1905
  3. Connolly v. AceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Afran Transport Co. v. Steamship TranscoloradoDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1971
  5. Thames Towboat Co. v. Central R. of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API