Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Moore

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 23, 1999No. 18210-0-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

An award of half the community interest in a pension to be disbursed in the future creates a property interest in the pension, not a lien against the pension unless the dissolution decree specifies otherwise. The recipient is therefore entitled to the disbursement value of her share at the time of distribution, rather than its value at the time of the decree.

Roger Moore appeals the declaratory judgment to that effect—his former wife, Judy Kirk, is entitled to half his pension at the time of distribution. We affirm.

FACTS

Roger Moore and his former wife, Judy Kirk, represented themselves in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Byrne v. AckerlundWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re the Marriage of ElamWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Farver v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re the Marriage of MudgettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. In re the Marriage of MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API