Enoch v. New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Flood, J.,
The question to be resolved on this appeal is whether the verdict for the plaintiff should be regarded as a proper compromise verdict, to be left undisturbed, or whether the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in granting a new trial by reason of the inadequacy of the verdict.
The verdict for the plaintiffs was in the sum of $2000. The repair of the damages which, they claim, resulted from the defendant’s blasting will cost a much *222larger sum—over $7000 according to the plaintiffs’ expert and something in excess of $4000 according to the defendant’s expert. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Laventhol v. A. DiSandro Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mazza v. Berlanti Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Harkins v. Ferrero, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1965