Legal Opinion

Enoch v. New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The question to be resolved on this appeal is whether the verdict for the plaintiff should be regarded as a proper compromise verdict, to be left undisturbed, or whether the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in granting a new trial by reason of the inadequacy of the verdict.

The verdict for the plaintiffs was in the sum of $2000. The repair of the damages which, they claim, resulted from the defendant’s blasting will cost a much *222larger sum—over $7000 according to the plaintiffs’ expert and something in excess of $4000 according to the defendant’s expert. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Laventhol v. A. DiSandro Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mazza v. Berlanti Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Harkins v. Ferrero, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API