Legal Opinion

H----L v. Matheson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1980No. 16249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff, seeking declaratory and injunc-tive relief, initiated this action for the purpose of having Section 76-7-304(2) declared unconstitutional and to enjoin the enforcement thereof. The trial court found the provision constitutionally valid, and plaintiff appeals therefrom. The judgment is affirmed. All statutory references are to the 1953 Utah Code Annotated, as amended.

Plaintiff, a fifteen year old girl, alleged she was pregnant with an unwanted child. She asserted she was in her first trimester of pregnancy. She claimed she did not wish to inform her parents of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. H. L. v. MathesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Jane L. v. BangerterDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992
  3. H___ B___ v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
  4. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Utah State Democratic Committee v. MonsonUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API