Clark v. Township of Falls
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether an attorney may be entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 when we have reversed the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff but the plaintiff claims he achieved one of the benefits he sought by the litigation through a post-trial out-of-court settlement of one issue. Appellant/cross-appellee David Clark brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that the appellees/cross-appellants, James Kett-ler, Charles Chimera, and the Township of Falls, had violated his rights under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jacqueline Watson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("Septa"), Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Globe Newspaper Company v. Beacon Hill Architectural CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Abner v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Lawrence L. Pedigo, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Jackson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.