Valles v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
The defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief, brought pursuant to Section 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 4, 1970), subsequently superseded by Section 41-23-1 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, Supp. 1975), raises the question of whether the following rule laid down in State v. Sparks, 85 N.M. 429, 512 P.2d 1265 (Ct.App.1973) should be accorded retroactive application:
“[0]nce the witness has testified at the criminal trial about that which he testified before the grand jury, the accused is entitled to an order permitting examination of that portion of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BartlettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. ManesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. VelasquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.