Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1989No. 10889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Chief Judge.
The state appeals the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of the interception of a telephone conversation between defendant and another person. The evidence was suppressed pursuant to the district court’s interpretation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-12-8(A) (Repl.Pamp.1984). We reverse.
FACTS. Pursuant to a court order authorizing the interception, the state tapped a telephone belonging to a person suspected of trafficking illegal drugs. The state recorded conversations between the suspect and defendant, and, based on that information as well as observations by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Sells v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Melendez-CarrionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. AccetturoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. McWhorterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996