Legal Opinion
In re the Tonopah United Water Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided December 23, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The original petitioner, Wheeler, takes the position that the sole question should be whether or not the master’s election when held was valid, and he cites In re Gulla, 13 Del. Ch. 23, 115 A. 317, as authority for that position. In re Gulla does not hold that the only objections which may be heard on the return of the master are such as go to the validity of the manner in which he conducted the election. I am of the opinion that the objections raised by the pending rule may be properly raised notwithstanding the master’s return has been filed.
The present rule calls for a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Gulla'Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
- Schultz v. Commonwealth Mortgage Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1919
3Cited by11 opinions
- Box v. BoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- ER Holdings, Inc. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Vanadium Corp. of America v. Susquehanna CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Gries v. Eversharp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1949
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.