Legal Opinion

Foust v. Birds Eye Division of General Foods Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1967No. 9834PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondent, in her claim and petition filed with the Industrial Accident Board, alleged that she had received a personal injury caused by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment by appellant, Birds Eye Division of General Foods Corporation. She prayed for an award of workmen’s compensation benefits. After a hearing, the Board ruled that respondent had received such an injury, I.C. § 72-201, and entered an award in her favor. Appellants have appealed from the award.

The sole issue presented is whether respondent’s injuries arose out of and in the course of her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kiger v. Idaho CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Eriksen v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Jaynes v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Mayo v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kessler Ex Rel. Kessler v. Payette CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API