Legal Opinion

Wead v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1933No. 28411PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Plaintiffs sued to have adjudged void, and to enjoin the defendants from collecting, certain special assessments, levied by the city of Omaha by special levy ordinance No*. 5337 to cover, in part, the cost of lands appropriated by the defendant city for opening and extending St. Mary’s avenue from Twenty-seventh street to a point' on Leavenworth street between Thirty-first street and Thirty-first avenue. Decrees were entered for plaintiffs as prayed, and defendant has appealed.

Plaintiffs allege that their several parcels and tracts of land derived no special benefits from such public…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portsmouth Savings Bank v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Weilage v. City of CreteNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burkley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Omaha & North Platte Railroad v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Miller County Highway & Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nebco, Inc. v. SpeedlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. North Platte, Nebraska Hospital Corp v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Belza v. Village of EmersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Midwest Development Corp. v. City of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API