Legal Opinion
United States v. Salerno
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 18, 1991No. 91 CR 429PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Defendant, James Salerno (“Salerno”), has filed twelve pretrial motions in this criminal action. The Government has filed two consolidated responses. 1 Salerno has not filed a reply. We rule on each of Salerno’s motions in turn.
1. Motion to Require Notice of Intention to Use Identification Testimony at Trial 2
In this motion, Salerno seeks an order compelling the Government to give notice of its intention to use eyewitness identification testimony against him. Salerno further states that if such identification evidence exists, he may file a motion to suppress.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Arzuaga RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
- People of the Virgin Islands v. Jose RiveraSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
- El Pueblo De P.R. v. Victor Arzuaga Rivera Y OtroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
- El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Maldonado De Jesus, JuanTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2025
- United States v. HoeffnerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008