Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoeffner

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 8, 2008No. Crim.A. No. H-07-263Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are Non-Party Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (Document No. 170), Motion to Quash Hoeffner’s Subpoena for Doeu-*304ments Served on The Hartford (Document No. 175), Motion to Quash Subpoena and Objections to Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on Non-Party The Travelers Companies, Inc. (Document No. 176), Non-Party, National Casualty Company’s Motion to Quash (Document No. 181), Non-Party Continental Casualty Company’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (Document No. 182), and Non-Party National Union Fire Insurance Company of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency v. American Commerce National Bank, Anaheim, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Tsai-Son Nguyen v. Excel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API