People v. Nitschmann
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Fifteen years ago we said: “Ralph Helmut Nitschmann has lead a life of crime.” (People v. Nitschmann (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 677, 679 [41 Cal.Rptr.2d 325].) Nothing has changed except the victim’s name and appellant’s good fortune at the “early disposition calendar.” His trial attorney succeeded in negotiating a five-year sentence before preliminary hearing and without a probation report.
When the trial court has sufficient information to make an informed judicial decision, an “early disposition calendar” is beneficial to the parties and the court.
It is ironic that appellant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. LuceroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. VoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Cobian CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Motley CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014