Legal Opinion
City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Upon the settlement of the decree, a question has arisen in regard to the amount recoverable for the loss of the effects of the master and crew of the bark Helen, which was sunk, and also as re*150gards the application of the sums allowed therefor. Both vessels were held in fault, (15 Fed. Rep. 624; 23 Fed. Rep. 616,) and the damages were ordered to be divided. The libelants were the owners of the Helen, and sued to recover for the loss of that ship, and also in behalf of the master and crew for the loss of their effects, as well, also, as carriers, for the recovery of the loss of cargo, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Commander-In-ChiefSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- City of ParisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878
- City of ParisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Job T. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1897
- Pacific Mail. S. S. Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- The CharlotteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904