Legal Opinion

The Job T. Wilson

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 23, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

These were libels to recover damages resulting from a collision between tbe steamtug Job T. Wilson and tbe steamship Howard. Tbe court heretofore, on July 28, 1897, found both tbe colliding vessels in fault, made a decree for divided damages, and referred tbe cause to a master to ascertain tbe amount.

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

In the matter of the proper decree to. be passed apportioning the damages resulting from a collision. The court, by its interlocutory decree of July 28, 1897, found both the colliding vessels in fault, and decreed that the damages should be divided, and referred the case to a master to ascertain the amounts. The original libel was hied by the Warwick Transportation Company, the owner, of the tug Job T. Wilson, against the steamship Howard, in rem. There was afterwards filed an intervening petition by the Virginia Dredging Company for the damages to a scow belonging to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. The" North Star"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. The " Alabama " & the " Game-Cock."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Keating v. Pacific Steam Whaling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. The MariskaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  4. The LivingstoneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1900
  5. Carlson v. United New York Sandy Hook Pilots' Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API