Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Richard Parsons v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2016No. 14-1288Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLoughry, Justice

(Filed May 12, 2016)

I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the circuit court’s order dismissing the action and compelling arbitration. I dissent to the extent the majority overrules our precedent to pave the path for a new point of law that is contrary, not only to the strong federal policy favoring arbitration, but also to the majority of jurisdictions that require proof of prejudice before a waiver of arbitration rights will be found.

Our common law demonstrates that general contract defenses, such as waiver, “may be applied to invalidate an arbitration agreement.” Syl. Pt. 9, in part,…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Directv, Inc. v. ImburgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. S & H Contractors, Inc., a Corporation v. A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc., a Corporation, A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc. v. S & H Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API